DCLP transcription: 63260 [xml]
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
1[ -ca.?- χ]α̣ῖρε(*) Οὐρανέ, χ[αῖ]ρε Πόσειδον
[ -ca.?- ]ς νότιον κλίμα δωμα̣[ -ca.?- ]
[ -ca.?- ]εων προκαθήμενε π̣[ -ca.?- ]
[ -ca.?- ] ἀ̣ρχή, χαῖρε τελευτ̣ή̣
5[ -ca.?- ἴσ]η̣ν(?)(*), ἐπὶ μοῖραν ὁρίζω̣[ν]
[ -ca.?- ] καὶ φωσπόρε(*), χαῖρε μ̣ε̣[ -ca.?- ]
[ -ca.?- ] ̣πων πολυγηθέα δω̣[ -2-4- ]
[ -ca.?- ]ις θε̣ρ̣ε̣ο̣[ς ̣ ̣]σ̣π̣ο̣δη[ -ca.?- ]
[ -ca.?- π]ροπάτ[ωρ ̣ ̣ ̣](*)υ̣τ̣ο̣[ -ca.?- ]
10[ -ca.?- ] ̣ι[ ̣ ̣]τ̣[ -ca.?- ]
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --.
Apparatus
^ 1.
l. [χ]α̣ῖρ’^ 5.
M. Perale (from Photo) (via PN) : [ -ca.?- ] ̣ν prev. ed.^ 6.
l. φωσφόρε^ 9.
M. Perale, ZPE 175 (2010) 25 : [ -ca.?- ]ρ̣οπα ̣τ ̣[ ̣ ̣ ̣ ̣ ̣ ̣] prev.
ed.
- 2020-04-06T14:30:23-04:00 [simoeis]: Finalized - Ready
- 2020-04-06T14:30:22-04:00 [simoeis]: Finalized - Ready
- 2020-04-06T14:18:00-04:00 [simoeis]: Vote - Accept-Straight-to-Finalization - See Sampson's comments. In line 5 and 9,
close [.?] within the lacuna. l. 5, eta seems fine--add (?) to signal uncertainty?
- 2020-04-06T14:18:00-04:00 [simoeis]: Vote - Accept-Straight-to-Finalization - See Sampson's comments. In line 5 and 9,
close [.?] within the lacuna. l. 5, eta seems fine--add (?) to signal uncertainty?
- 2019-08-17T17:12:35-04:00 [Mike%20Sampson]: Vote - ReturnToSender - Generally fine, but some changes needed. Text: replace all
lunate sigmas and encode sublinear dots properly (esp. ll. 5, 7-10). In l.5, eta was
suggested by the ed.pr., but based on the digital image, it seems the least likely
possibility to me, even though (as the editors note) a long is required. I recommend
printing the reading of the ed.pr., (a dotted letter) and noting the possibilities
in a comment. Meta: limit the page number for 78648 to p.25, on which this papyrus
is discussed.
- 2019-08-17T17:12:35-04:00 [Mike%20Sampson]: Vote - ReturnToSender - Generally fine, but some changes needed. Text: replace all
lunate sigmas and encode sublinear dots properly (esp. ll. 5, 7-10). In l.5, eta was
suggested by the ed.pr., but based on the digital image, it seems the least likely
possibility to me, even though (as the editors note) a long is required. I recommend
printing the reading of the ed.pr., (a dotted letter) and noting the possibilities
in a comment. Meta: limit the page number for 78648 to p.25, on which this papyrus
is discussed.
- 2019-08-16T09:51:12-04:00 [james.cowey]: Submit - Originally submitted to litpap.info 2018.07.24 by Marco Perale. Submission
has been transferred to papyri.info. Submission notes were: “Entering past and ongoing
work on hexameter adespota. Text after editio princeps (= ZPE, same as P.Köln I 6).
I have added editors' supplements in Commentary section. Moved and changed ‘Display
Name’; added script type in physical description and notes; added measurements; change
link to image; added bibliography; please consider deleting ‘lyric’ in keywords: this
is hexametric.“
- 2019-08-16T09:51:12-04:00 [james.cowey]: Submit - Originally submitted to litpap.info 2018.07.24 by Marco Perale. Submission
has been transferred to papyri.info. Submission notes were: “Entering past and ongoing
work on hexameter adespota. Text after editio princeps (= ZPE, same as P.Köln I 6).
I have added editors' supplements in Commentary section. Moved and changed ‘Display
Name’; added script type in physical description and notes; added measurements; change
link to image; added bibliography; please consider deleting ‘lyric’ in keywords: this
is hexametric.“
- 2014-12-10 [DCLP]: Crosswalked to EpiDoc XML
© Duke Databank of Documentary Papyri.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.