Papyri.info

Apparatus

^ i.13. or [- ca.24 - Ὅ]μηρος (?)
^ i.23. or [1 line missing]
^ ii.2. or σκιρτῶσ[ι(?) - ca.22 -], or σκιρτῶσ[ιν(?) - ca.21 -]
^ ii.3. or [ἐσ]|τι
^ ii.4. ˙ papyrus
^ ii.4. or λωποδ[υτοῦντες (?) - ca.14 -], or λωποδ[υτήσαντες (?) - ca.13 -]
^ ii.5. ˙ papyrus
^ ii.5. or μοιχε[ύοντες - ca.17 -], or μοιχε[ύσαντες - ca.16 -]
^ ii.6. ˙ papyrus
^ ii.7. ˙ papyrus
^ ii.7. or ἵνα δ[ὲ - ca.22 -], or ἵν’ ἀδ[- ca.23 -] : ϊναδ papyrus
^ ii.9. ˙ papyrus
^ ii.9. or οἷον [⁦ -ca.?- ⁩ ἐν τῷ]
^ ii.10. ˙ papyrus
^ ii.12. l. τιμησι  ̣, or [ἐπι]|τίμησις̣ (?), or [ἐπι]|τίμησιν̣ (?)
^ ii.14. or λίβυς η (?), or λιβύσ<σ>η (?)
^ ii.14. ϊν̣ papyrus
^ ii.15. or χω σκ̣αφ̣ (?)
^ ii.16. or βδε[λυρία]
^ ii.18. or [ὁ χω]|λὸς Ἥφαισ[τος - ca.19 -] (?), or [ὁ δό]|λος Ἡφαίσ[του - ca.19 -]
^ ii.21. ˙ papyrus
^ ii.25. or χηγ̣ο̣ς̣ (?), or [ἀρ]|χηγ̣ό̣ς̣
^ ii.25. or τ̣[ῆς φιλοσοφίας (?) - ca.12 -]
^ ii.26. or Πλάτων
^ ii.27. or ἐν νομῇ

Editorial History; All History; (detailed)

• 2023-03-21T13:23:29-04:00 [Mike%20Sampson]: Finalized - This is good to go
• 2023-03-21T13:23:29-04:00 [Mike%20Sampson]: Finalized - This is good to go
• 2023-01-10T09:47:39-05:00 [Mike%20Sampson]: Vote - Accept-Straight-to-Finalization - Review text carefully; dots have all been mis-entered. Metadata will also require a close examination before finalization
• 2023-01-10T09:47:39-05:00 [Mike%20Sampson]: Vote - Accept-Straight-to-Finalization - Review text carefully; dots have all been mis-entered. Metadata will also require a close examination before finalization
• 2023-01-08T09:31:53-05:00 [RobertaCarlesimo]: Submit - PSI XVII 1670 (first DCLP ed.). Some notes: In the introduction, column width is indicated in ca. 30 characters. I use this datum to indicate the number of characters lost in the gaps. Col. II 1-3. The asteriskos are in the left margin a little bit dislocated under l. 1 and 2; in the ed. pr. they are indicated between ll. 1-2 and 2-3. I was not able to reproduce that. Moreover, I have problem in the visualization of the signs. Col. II 2. σ vac. ? κιρτωσ[. In the ed. pr. is indicated that the vac. is probably due to a damaged fiber. Col. II 3. I have problem to indicate that the integration is at the end of l. 2. Col. II 12. l. τιμησι ̣. I am not able to visualize a question mark after the word; moreover, the correction in that way is visualized as referred to both the lines and not only to l. 12. Col. II 21-22. The asteriskos is between the two lines. Col. II 23-24. The lines are in ekthesis, but if I try to use the indicated codification, I have problem in the visualization of the text.
• 2023-01-08T09:31:53-05:00 [RobertaCarlesimo]: Submit - PSI XVII 1670 (first DCLP ed.). Some notes: In the introduction, column width is indicated in ca. 30 characters. I use this datum to indicate the number of characters lost in the gaps. Col. II 1-3. The asteriskos are in the left margin a little bit dislocated under l. 1 and 2; in the ed. pr. they are indicated between ll. 1-2 and 2-3. I was not able to reproduce that. Moreover, I have problem in the visualization of the signs. Col. II 2. σ vac. ? κιρτωσ[. In the ed. pr. is indicated that the vac. is probably due to a damaged fiber. Col. II 3. I have problem to indicate that the integration is at the end of l. 2. Col. II 12. l. τιμησι ̣. I am not able to visualize a question mark after the word; moreover, the correction in that way is visualized as referred to both the lines and not only to l. 12. Col. II 21-22. The asteriskos is between the two lines. Col. II 23-24. The lines are in ekthesis, but if I try to use the indicated codification, I have problem in the visualization of the text.
• 2023-01-06T06:42:25-05:00 [editor]: Automated creation from template

• No further history recorded.