DDbDP transcription: o.abu.mina.125 [xml]
† ἀπὸ Ἀναστασί[ου]
διακό(νου) ὀ[ν(ικαὶ) φορὲ](*) [ -ca.?- ]
- 2011-06-21T18:26:29.004-04:00 [joshuad.sosin]: Finalized - ready
- 2011-06-21T18:26:28.999-04:00 [joshuad.sosin]: Vote - Accept-Straight-to-FInalization - Accept. Note on lin2 confuses me. If φορε
is to be restored, as seems to be the suggestion, then --> φοραὶ|reg|φορὲ
- 2011-06-20T03:21:52.008-04:00 [PaulvdLaan]: Entered Greek text from O.AbuMina 125. Lin2-> if supplemented φορὲ, then ὀ[ν[ικαὶ),not
ὀ[ν(ικ- ). If in appar φ(ο)ρ(αὶ), then in text also φ(ο)ρ(ὲ),(which is by the way
not at all on papyrus(ostracon), odd mention in preview!). Guessed digit after φορὲ,
rather <#.1=#> than <#.?=#>, based on parallels, but you never know
- 2011-06-20T02:50:09-04:00 [editor]: Automated creation from template
- 2011-12-14 [gabrielbodard]: rationalized languages in langUsage
- 2011-12-14 [gabrielbodard]: changed editor names to URIs
- 2011-10-04 [Faith]: Automatically updated revision description
- 2011-09-20 [Faith]: Automated transfer of accents across reg-orig pairs
© Duke Databank of Documentary Papyri.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.