DDbDP transcription: o.did.421 [xml]
Ἄμπελος Σεραπει̣[άδι](*) [τῇ]
ἀδελφῇ πλεῖστ[α χαίρειν·]
ἀπ' ὅτε(*) ενοιδικ(*) ̣[ ̣ ̣ ̣ πε-]
ρὶ τοῦ χ̣ιτῶνο̣[ς -ca.?- ]-
5αντι ἐγραψ[ -ca.?- ](*)
ἑτοιμακα[ -ca.?- ]
εἰρηκε[ -ca.?- ]
ερχομ[ -ca.?- ]
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Apparatus
^ 1.
l. Σεραπι[άδι]^ 3.
l. ἀφ' ὅτε^ 3.
l. ὠνείδικ (corr)^ 4-5.
or [] | ἀντιέγραψ[ -ca.?- ], J. Gascou (via PN) : [] | ἀντιέγραψ[ -ca.?- ] O.Did. 421
- 2013-07-30T15:23:13.364-04:00 [joshuad.sosin]: Finalized - Ready. Decided at line 6 to leave Gascou's ἑτοιμακα[.?] for Ed's ἑτοίμακα[.?]
as a 'silent' change. It will of course be attributed to him in the revision history.
As an emendation this has the potential to be rather messy for perhaps not enormous
gain.
- 2013-07-30T15:23:13.357-04:00 [berkes.lajos]: Vote - AcceptText - See Sosin's comments
- 2013-07-30T15:23:13.346-04:00 [joshuad.sosin]: Vote - AcceptText - Accept. Lin1--> <:Σεραπι[άδι]|reg|Σεραπει̣[άδι]:>; lin3--> <:ἀφ'
ὅτε|reg|ἀπ' ὅτε:>; lin3--> .1[.3] [πε]; lin4--> χ̣ιτῶνο̣[ς] [.?]; lin 5: ed has ἀντιέγραψ[.?],
which index attests ed thinks of as a form of antigrapho; Gascou here proposes that
this is either 2 words or 1, in which case the L+ should be: <:<:[.?]5.- αντι ἐγραψ[.?]|alt|[.?]5.
ἀντιέγραψ[.?]:>=PN J. Gascou|ed|[.?]5. ἀντιέγραψ[.?]=O.Did. 421:>; similarly at lin6
with accented and unaccented form.
- 2013-07-11T02:34:32.71-04:00 [jean%20gascou]: new text created
- 2013-07-11T02:32:18-04:00 [editor]: Automated creation from template
- No further history recorded.
© Duke Databank of Documentary Papyri.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
