Papyri.info

Apparatus

Editorial History; All History; (detailed)

• 2012-06-19T03:19:21.076-04:00 [jenniferacromwell]: Finalized - Ready.
• 2012-06-19T03:19:21.062-04:00 [jenniferacromwell]: Vote - AcceptText - Accept with following changes: Line 1: superlinear above Θὼθ. Line 1: I follow Alain D. so ~|ⲛⲓ|~cop(|ἀνδ|). Line 2: --> ~|ⲧⲙ̅ⲟ̅ⲩⲛⲥⲓⲙ|~cop. Line 2. Provide both alternates in apparatus?: --> <:(|μεκ|)|alt|(μεγ(άλα))|(μικ(ρὰ)):>. line 3: ~|ⲗⲟⲩⲕⲁⲥ ⲡⲙⲁ ⲛϭⲁⲙⲟⲩⲗ|~cop. [i.e. space after ⲡⲙⲁ].
• 2012-06-19T03:19:21.05-04:00 [Alain%20D.]: Vote - AcceptText - Accept. Line 1: there is a supraline on Θὼθ -> ¯Θὼθ¯. Line 1: I don't know what νιανδ is. Is it Greek? Is it Coptic? Or is it a mix of the two, as suggested in ed.pr.: ⲛⲓ and (|ανδ|) [= ἄνδρες or ἀνδρισμός), but ed. pr. indicates that it would be a very strange combination. Apparently, the use of ἀ seems to indicate that we follow the ed. pr.'s commentary. In this case, νι is Coptic and I suggest -> ~|ⲛⲓ|~cop(|ἀνδ|). Line 2: since the toponyms are written in Coptic in these texts, I suggest -⟩ ⲧ¯ⲙⲟ¯ⲩⲛⲥⲓⲙ. Line 2: Line 3: For μ̄εκ, ed. pr. and SB suggest to read μικ(ρά), but μεγ(άλα) is also possible (κ for γ is very common). I suggest (|¯μ¯εκ|) in the text and <:(μεγ(άλα))|reg|(¯μ¯εκ(άλα)):> or <:(μικ(ρὰ))|reg|(¯μ¯εκ(ρὰ)):> in the apparatus. Line 3: for Loukas, there is no difference for this name between Greek and Coptic (ⲗⲟⲩⲕⲁⲥ and Λουκᾶς). Since the proper names are usually written in Coptic in these texts, I would suggest to use the Coptic caracters -> ⲗⲟⲩⲕⲁⲥ.
• 2011-08-03T11:17:49.671-04:00 [Georg]: Coptic word in Coptic letters

• 2011-03-02 [gabrielbodard]: batch converted all tei:sic to tei:orig and tei:corr to tei:reg
• 2010-05-05 [gabrielbodard]: changed schema; added xml:space=preserve; indented; moved title/@n to idno
• 2009-11-12 [gabrielbodard]: Added language la-Grek
• 2009-06-27 [gabrielbodard]: Converted from TEI P4 (EpiDoc DTD v. 6) to P5 (EpiDoc RNG schema)
• 2008-12-23 [papyri.info]: Automated split from transcoder files