DDbDP transcription: p.bour.12 [xml]
88 BC Pathyris
[Reprinted from: chr.wilck.12] W.Chr. 12
r Πλάτων τοῖς ἐν Παθύρει
ἱερεῦσι καὶ τοῖς ἄλλοις
τοῖς κατοικοῦσι
χαίρειν. γέγραφεν
5ἡμῖν Φιλόξενος
ὁ ἀδελφὸς διʼ ὧν κεκό-
μικεν ἡμῖν Ὄρσης
γραμμάτων περὶ τοῦ
τὸν μέγιστον Θεὸν
10Σωτῆρα βασιλέα
ἐπιβεβληκέναι
εἰς Μέμφιν, Ἱέρακα δὲ
προκεχειρίσθαι
μετὰ δυνάμεων
15μυρίων ἐπὶ κατα-
στολὴν τῆς Θηβαίδος.
ὅπως οὖν εἰδότες
εὐθαρσεῖς ὑπάρ-
χηιτε(*) ἐκρίναμεν
20σημῆναι.
——(*)
ἔρρ(ωσθε) (ἔτους) λ Φαῶφι ιθ v τοῖς ἐν Παθύρει
ἰερεῦσι καὶ τοῖς ἄλλοις.
Apparatus
^ r.18.
l. ὑπάρ|χητε, B. Laudenbach from original (via PN) : ὑπάρ|χητε prev. ed.^ r.20.
B. Laudenbach from original (via PN) : prev. ed.
- 2024-11-19T10:42:09-05:00 [james.cowey]: Finalized - Ready.
- 2024-11-19T10:17:09-05:00 [james.cowey]: Vote - Accept-Straight-to-Finalization - "=Laudenbach from original" => "=PN B.Laudenbach
from original". The reading is clear.
- 2024-11-19T09:46:20-05:00 [Laudenbach]: Submit - I corrected ὑπάρχητε in ὑπάρχηιτε as it appears on the papyrus (l.18-19),
and added a paragraphos. Neither was mentionned by the previous editors.
- 2024-11-19T09:45:20-05:00 [Laudenbach]: Commit - I corrected ὑπάρχητε in ὑπάρχηιτε as it appears on the papyrus, and added
a paragraphos
- 2023-09-05T07:46:29-04:00 [mgerhardt]: Finalized - Ready.
- 2023-09-05T02:40:55-04:00 [mgerhardt]: Vote - Accept-Straight-to-Finalization - Fine.
- 2023-09-04T11:45:57-04:00 [Laudenbach]: Submit - l.16 I deleted (¨) on Θηβαίδος. I don't know where this information comes
from and I think it's just a misunderstanding of the published text by Collart (Chrest.Wilck.
12 doesn't show it). I checked on the papyrus itself and on the picture and there's
no trace of diaeresis. There's a manufacturing defect on the papyrus, but no missing
fibre which could have disappeared.
- 2023-09-04T11:41:50-04:00 [Laudenbach]: Commit - l.16 I deleted (¨) on Θηβαίδος. I don't know where this information comes
from and I think it's just a misunderstanding of the edited text. I checked on the
papyrus itself and on the picture and there's no trace of diaeresis. There's a manufacturing
defect on the papyrus, but no missing fibre.
- 2023-09-04T11:41:01-04:00 [Laudenbach]: Commit - l.16 I deleted (¨) on Θηβαίδος. I don't know where this information comes
from and I think it's just a misunderstanding of the edited text. I checked on the
papyrus itself and on the picture and there's no trace of diaeresis. There's a manufacturing
defect on the papyrus, but no missing fibre.
- 2011-12-14 [gabrielbodard]: rationalized languages in langUsage
- 2011-12-14 [gabrielbodard]: changed editor names to URIs
- 2011-10-31 [gabrielbodard]: changed type=inWord to break=no
- 2010-05-05 [gabrielbodard]: changed schema; added xml:space=preserve; indented; moved title/@n to idno
- 2009-11-12 [gabrielbodard]: Added language la-Grek
- 2009-06-27 [gabrielbodard]: Converted from TEI P4 (EpiDoc DTD v. 6) to P5 (EpiDoc RNG schema)
- 2008-12-23 [papyri.info]: Automated split from transcoder files
© Duke Databank of Documentary Papyri.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
