DDbDP transcription: o.frange.140 [xml]
encrypted ⳨ ⲕⲑⲱⲗⲅϥ(*)ⲥ
ⲱⲃⲫⲓϥⲝⲥⲭ(*)ⲱⲃⲱ
ⲅⲛⲉⲭϫⲑϥ(*)
ϩⲝⲕϫⲗⲉϥⲱ
5ϣⲟⲃⲟⲉϫⲥϥ(*)
ⲅⲑⲛⲑⲕⲃ
ϩⲑⲝⲃϥ interpreted ⳨ ⲡⲁⲥⲟⲛ ⲓ(*)ⲱ-
ⲥⲏⲫ ϥⲓ ⲙⲱⲩ(*)ⲥⲏⲥ
ⲛⲅⲉⲓ ⲟⲩϫⲁⲓ(*)
ϩⲙ ⲡϫⲟⲉⲓⲥ
5ϣⲗⲏⲗ ⲉϫⲱⲓ(*)
ⲛⲁⲅⲁⲡⲏ(*)
ϩⲁⲙⲏⲛ
Apparatus
^ encrypted.1.
ⲕⲑⲱⲗⲅϥ̈ⲥ papyrus^ encrypted.2.
ⲱⲃⲫⲓϥⲝⲥⲭ̈ⲱⲃⲱ papyrus^ encrypted.3.
ⲅⲛⲉⲭϫⲑϥ̈ papyrus^ encrypted.5.
ϣⲟⲃⲟⲉϫⲥϥ̈ papyrus^ interpreted.1.
ⲓ̈ⲱ papyrus^ interpreted.2.
ⲙⲱⲩ̈ⲥⲏⲥ papyrus^ interpreted.3.
ⲟⲩϫⲁⲓ̈ papyrus^ interpreted.5.
ⲉϫⲱⲓ̈ papyrus^ interpreted.6.
i.e. Greek ἀγάπη
- 2020-02-05T11:04:14-05:00 [L.%20Vanderheyden]: Finalized - ready
- 2015-03-23T04:14:11-04:00 [anne.boudhors]: Vote - AcceptText - 1. This text is not written recto and verso, this is cryptography
with it's explicitation. How should it be encoded? 2. Instead of superlinear strokes
in the crypted text, put diairesis as in the ostracon, since it is possible with the
Editor. 3. Explicitation line 1=> ⲡⲁⲥⲟⲛ ⲓ(¨)ⲱ (diairesis forgotten by the editor)
- 2015-03-06T11:02:24-05:00 [Georg]: Vote - AcceptText - OK
- 2015-03-02T03:33:01.003-05:00 [M.J.Albarran]: Coptic ostracon. on recto: supralinear strokes in lines 1-3 and 5, on the one hand
in the edition are a supralinear dot, on the other hand, in ostracon are two supralinear
dots, like diaeresis.
- 2015-03-02T03:33:00-05:00 [M.J.Albarran]: Submit - Coptic ostracon. on recto: supralinear strokes in lines 1-3 and 5, on the
one hand in the edition are a supralinear dot, on the other hand, in ostracon are
two supralinear dots, like diaeresis.
- 2015-03-02T03:14:56-05:00 [editor]: Automated creation from template
- No further history recorded.
© Duke Databank of Documentary Papyri.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.